Mind the gap – Why is implementing research into practice so challenging?
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Evidence-based guidelines have been developed as a strategy to synthesise current research and develop recommendations designed to help clinicians make decisions about patient management within specific clinical contexts.1 Such synthesis is needed to support time and resource poor clinicians to ensure that their clinical practice reflects the best available evidence. In many, but not all, cases guidelines have been rigorously developed and evaluated, most commonly against the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II appraisal guidelines (AGREE II).2 The inclusion of high quality research in systematically developed clinical practice guidelines is one strategy thought to help ensure delivery of evidence-based clinical care. However, the presence of guidelines themselves does not ensure that the research is implemented into clinical practice. We also do not know which strategies are likely to be best in disseminating and implementing guideline recommendations.
Journal Title
Australian Critical Care
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
30
Issue
6
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Nursing
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Critical Care Medicine
General & Internal Medicine
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Marshall, A, Mind the gap - Why is implementing research into practice so challenging?, Australian Critical Care, 2017, 30 (6), pp. 287-288