Cutting Through Legal Arguments: Constitutional Recognition
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
On 19 January 2012, the Prime Minister's Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples ('the Panel') delivered its report on the constitutional recognition of Indigenous Australians.1 From the convening of the Panel and since the report was delivered, there has been a lot of comment and public debate. Much of this has centred on the legal implications of constitutional change, although inevitably there has been political debate also. Sometimes it is difficult to tell the difference
Journal Title
Indigenous Law Bulletin
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
8
Issue
15
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2014 Indigenous Law Centre and the author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author(s).
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Policy and administration
Legal systems
Private law and civil obligations
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Galloway, K, Cutting Through Legal Arguments: Constitutional Recognition’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 2014, 8 (15), pp. 3-5