An evidence-based framework for determining the optimal amount of intervention for autistic children
File version
Author(s)
Waddington, Hannah
Sulek, Rhylee
Varcin, Kandice
Bent, Catherine
Ashburner, Jill
Eapen, Valsamma
Goodall, Emma
Hudry, Kristelle
Silove, Natalie
Whitehouse, Andrew
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
The provision of timely, effective, and socially valid non-pharmacological intervention is at the core of efforts to support the development of young autistic children. These efforts are intended to support children to develop skills, empower their caregivers, and lay the foundation for optimal choice, independence, and quality of life into adulthood. But what is the optimal amount of intervention? In this Viewpoint, we review current guidelines and consider evidence from an umbrella review of non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children aged up to 12 years. We show the lack of consensus on the issue, identify factors that might be relevant to consider, and present an evidence-based framework for determining the optimal amount of intervention for each child, along with recommendations for future research.
Journal Title
The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
This publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Adolescent health
Paediatrics
Public health
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Trembath, D; Waddington, H; Sulek, R; Varcin, K; Bent, C; Ashburner, J; Eapen, V; Goodall, E; Hudry, K; Silove, N; Whitehouse, A, An evidence-based framework for determining the optimal amount of intervention for autistic children, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 2021