Response to Re: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a New Zealand experience (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Bloomfield, Ian
Van Dalen, Roelof
Loloahea, Simiona
Wu, Linus
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Apologies, the statement you indicated1is not based from our studyfindings but based on findings supported by papers referenced in thearticle as an introductory statement. This brief literature review wasperformed to support our belief, as yours, that transanal endoscopic microsurgery is in fact better oncologically than either mucosal re-section or direct trans-anal excision.2–6Though our study is only areview of results that conclusion is not at all drawn from our report.We wished to report our results from a regional centre, but unfor-tunately do not have the facility to perform a randomized study.I hope this clarifies any confusion regarding this statement.

Journal Title

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

88

Issue

9

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Surgery

LARGE RECTAL ADENOMAS

MUCOSAL RESECTION

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Bloomfield, I; Van Dalen, R; Loloahea, S; Wu, L, Response to Re: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a New Zealand experience (Letter), ANZ Journal of Surgery, 2018, 88 (9), pp. 940-940