Is an auditor's propensity to issue going concern opinions a valid measure of audit quality?

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Guo, Yihan
Delaney, Deborah
Ahmed, Ammad
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

A number of previous studies use auditor propensity to issue a going concern opinion (GCO) as a proxy of audit quality when examining a sample of financially distressed firms. This study examines whether audit quality (measured by discretionary accruals) influences the probability of financially distressed firms receiving GCOs using a non-specific sample of 2937 firm-year observations from Australia over the period 2011–2015. The study first investigates the association between financially distressed firms and the issuance of GCOs. This association is then re-tested after separating the total sample into low and high audit quality subsamples. The results indicate that financially distressed firms are more likely to receive GCOs, confirming the application of ASA 570 Going Concern. However, financially distressed firms that receive GCOs from their auditors are limited to firms that have higher-quality audits.

Journal Title

Australian Accounting Review

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

30

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Other economics

Social Sciences

Business, Finance

Business & Economics

NONAUDIT SERVICE FEES

DISCRETIONARY-ACCRUALS

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Guo, Y; Delaney, D; Ahmed, A, Is an auditor's propensity to issue going concern opinions a valid measure of audit quality?, Australian Accounting Review, 30 (2), pp. 144-153

Collections