Is an auditor's propensity to issue going concern opinions a valid measure of audit quality?
File version
Author(s)
Delaney, Deborah
Ahmed, Ammad
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
A number of previous studies use auditor propensity to issue a going concern opinion (GCO) as a proxy of audit quality when examining a sample of financially distressed firms. This study examines whether audit quality (measured by discretionary accruals) influences the probability of financially distressed firms receiving GCOs using a non-specific sample of 2937 firm-year observations from Australia over the period 2011–2015. The study first investigates the association between financially distressed firms and the issuance of GCOs. This association is then re-tested after separating the total sample into low and high audit quality subsamples. The results indicate that financially distressed firms are more likely to receive GCOs, confirming the application of ASA 570 Going Concern. However, financially distressed firms that receive GCOs from their auditors are limited to firms that have higher-quality audits.
Journal Title
Australian Accounting Review
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
30
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Other economics
Social Sciences
Business, Finance
Business & Economics
NONAUDIT SERVICE FEES
DISCRETIONARY-ACCRUALS
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Guo, Y; Delaney, D; Ahmed, A, Is an auditor's propensity to issue going concern opinions a valid measure of audit quality?, Australian Accounting Review, 30 (2), pp. 144-153