Self-regulated learning: why is it important compared to traditional learning in medical education?
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Nyandowe, Masimba
Zubair, Omar
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Self-regulated learning has played an increasingly significant role in medical education over the last one to two decades. Medical educators have endeavored to ensure that the students are equipped to face the challenges of continued growth of medical knowledge. Here we enquire and reflect on various aspects of self-regulated learning including its strengths and weaknesses. We investigate how it could be incorporated with traditional teaching to bring the best out of the students and what students think about it.
Journal Title
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
8
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2017 Siddaiah-Subramanya et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Curriculum and pedagogy
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
self-regulated learning
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Siddaiah-Subramanya, M; Nyandowe, M; Zubair, O, Self-regulated learning: why is it important compared to traditional learning in medical education?, Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 2017, 8, pp. 243-245