Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
McCarthy, Kate L
Sime, Fekade B
Naicker, Saiyuri
Heffernan, Aaron J
Wallis, Steven C
Paterson, David L
Roberts, Jason A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Khursigara, Cezar M
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Debate continues as to the role of combination antibiotic therapy for the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. We studied the extent of bacterial killing by and the emergence of resistance to meropenem and amikacin as monotherapies and as a combination therapy against susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa isolates from bacteremic patients using the dynamic in vitro hollow-fiber infection model. Three P. aeruginosa isolates (meropenem MICs of 0.125, 0.25, and 64 mg/L) were used, simulating bacteremia with an initial inoculum of;1 × 105 CFU/mL and the expected pharmacokinetics of meropenem and amikacin in critically ill patients. For isolates susceptible to amikacin and meropenem (isolates 1 and 2), the extent of bacterial killing was increased with the combination regimen compared with the killing by monotherapy of either antibiotic. Both the combination and meropenem monotherapy were able to sustain bacterial killing throughout the 7-day treatment course, whereas regrowth of bacteria occurred with amikacin monotherapy after 12 h. For the meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolate (isolate 3), only the combination regimen demonstrated bacterial killing. Given that tailored antibiotic regimens can maximize potential synergy against some isolates, future studies should explore the benefit of combination therapy against resistant P. aeruginosa. IMPORTANCE Current guidelines recommend that aminoglycosides should be used in combination with b-lactam antibiotics as initial empirical therapy for serious infections, and otherwise, patients should receive b-lactam antibiotic monotherapy. Given the challenges associated with studying the clinical effect of different antibiotic strategies on patient outcomes, useful data for subsequent informed clinical testing can be obtained from in vitro models like the hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Based on the findings of our HFIM, we propose that the initial use of combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin provides some bacterial killing against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates. For susceptible isolates, combination therapy may only be of benefit in specific patient populations, such as critically ill or immunocompromised patients. Therefore, clinicians may want to consider using the combination therapy for the initial management and ceasing the aminoglycosides once antibiotic susceptibility results have been obtained.
Journal Title
Microbiology Spectrum
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
10
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2022 Avent et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Medical bacteriology
Haematology
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Microbiology
amikacin
meropenem
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Avent, ML; McCarthy, KL; Sime, FB; Naicker, S; Heffernan, AJ; Wallis, SC; Paterson, DL; Roberts, JA, Evaluating Mono- and Combination Therapy of Meropenem and Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in the Hollow-Fiber Infection Model, Microbiology Spectrum, 2022, 10 (3)