The key incident monitoring and management system - history and role in quality improvement

Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Badrick, Tony
Gay, Stephanie
Mackay, Mark
Sikaris, Ken
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
File type(s)

Background: The determination of reliable, practical Quality Indicators (QIs) from presentation of the patient with a pathology request form through to the clinician receiving the report (the Total Testing Process or TTP) is a key step in identifying areas where improvement is necessary in laboratories.

Methods: The Australasian QIs programme Key Incident Monitoring and Management System (KIMMS) began in 2008. It records incidents (process defects) and episodes (occasions at which incidents may occur) to calculate incident rates. KIMMS also uses the Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) to assign quantified risk to each incident type. The system defines risk as incident frequency multiplied by both a harm rating (on a 1–10 scale) and detection difficulty score (also a 1–10 scale).

Results: Between 2008 and 2016, laboratories participating rose from 22 to 69. Episodes rose from 13.2 to 43.4 million; incidents rose from 114,082 to 756,432. We attribute the rise in incident rate from 0.86% to 1.75% to increased monitoring. Haemolysis shows the highest incidence (22.6% of total incidents) and the highest risk (26.68% of total risk). “Sample is suspected to be from the wrong patient” has the second lowest frequency, but receives the highest harm rating (10/10) and detection difficulty score (10/10), so it is calculated to be the 8th highest risk (2.92%). Similarly, retracted (incorrect) reports QI has the 10th highest frequency (3.9%) but the harm/difficulty calculation confers the second highest risk (11.17%).

Conclusions: TTP incident rates are generally low (less than 2% of observed episodes), however, incident risks, their frequencies multiplied by both ratings of harm and discovery difficulty scores, concentrate improvement attention and resources on the monitored incident types most important to manage.

Journal Title

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Conference Title
Book Title




Thesis Type
Degree Program
Publisher link
Patent number
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter & Co. KG Publishers. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Access the data
Related item(s)

Clinical sciences

Cognitive and computational psychology

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Medical Laboratory Technology

Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)

post-analytical error

Persistent link to this record

Badrick, T; Gay, S; Mackay, M; Sikaris, K, The key incident monitoring and management system - history and role in quality improvement, Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2018, 56 (2), pp. 264-272