Income Management and Intersectionality: Analysing Compulsory Income Management through the lenses of Critical Race Theory and Critical Disability Studies (‘DisCrit’)
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Beaupert, Fleur
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This article investigates the relationship between racism, ableism and classism in the context of compulsory income management, with a focus on difficulties encountered by people experiencing these intersections. We analyse government-commissioned evaluation reports of income management in the Northern Territory, using Critical Race Theory and Disability Studies as analytical tools. Experiences of social security recipients falling within the ‘vulnerable’ income management stream who participated in the evaluation indicate that Indigenous people with a disability are at greater risk of social exclusion due to the negative impacts of compulsory income management law. We argue that diminished financial autonomy caused by the ‘vulnerable’ income management measure has produced significant harm for some recipients, undermining their capacity to secure basic needs. We also consider human rights compatibility problems with ‘vulnerable’ income management, drawing upon international human rights principles, and conclude that it produces indirect race and disability discrimination.
Journal Title
The Sydney Law Review
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
41
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2019 University of Sydney. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Law in context
Public law
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Bielefeld, S; Beaupert, F, Income Management and Intersectionality: Analysing Compulsory Income Management through the lenses of Critical Race Theory and Critical Disability Studies (‘DisCrit’), The Sydney Law Review, 2019, 41 (3), pp. 327-357