Assisted colonization risk assessment: Response (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Brodie, JF
Lieberman, S
Moehrenschlager, A
Redford, KH
Rodríguez, JP
Schwartz, M
Seddon, PJ
Watson, JEM
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Ricciardi and Simberloff highlight the dangers of some species introductions (which are real) but do not address the concurrent (and also very real) dangers of inaction when it comes to ameliorating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity. We are not proposing what the guidance about assisted colonization should be or endorsing assisted colonization in all cases. We propose just the opposite—that a task force of experts develop guidance and best practice. Assisted colonization is going to be used and has been used (1). We agree that there are cases when it would not be appropriate, but maintaining a policy void will not stop people from taking action. Well-constructed policy guidance would assist conservationists and governments in making informed decisions. There are 196 governments that are Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, and it is far preferable to develop guidance on translocation decision-making that all of these governments could consult than to have 196 separate approaches.

Journal Title

Science

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

372

Issue

6545

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biosecurity science and invasive species ecology

Ecology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Brodie, JF; Lieberman, S; Moehrenschlager, A; Redford, KH; Rodríguez, JP; Schwartz, M; Seddon, PJ; Watson, JEM, Assisted colonization risk assessment: Response (Letter), Science, 2021, 372 (6545), pp. 925-926

Collections