A critical care pandemic staffing framework in Australia

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Marshall, Andrea P
Austin, Danielle E
Chamberlain, Di
Chapple, Lee-anne S
Cree, Michele
Fetterplace, Kate
Foster, Michelle
Freeman–Sanderson, Amy
Fyfe, Rachel
Grealy, Bernadette A
Hodak, Alison
Holley, Anthony
Kruger, Peter
Kucharski, Geraldine
et al.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Background: Pandemics and the large-scale outbreak of infectious disease can significantly impact morbidity and mortality worldwide. The impact on intensive care resources can be significant and often require modification of service delivery, a key element which includes rapid expansion of the critical care workforce. Pandemics are also unpredictable, which necessitates rapid decision-making and action which, in the lack of experience and guidance, may be extremely challenging. Recognising the potential strain on intensive care units (ICUs), particularly on staffing, a working group was formed for the purpose of developing recommendations to support decision-making during rapid service expansion. Methods: The Critical Care Pandemic Staffing Working Party (n = 21), representing nursing, allied health, and medical disciplines, has used a modified consensus approach to provide recommendations to inform multidisciplinary workforce capacity expansion planning in critical care. Results: A total of 60 recommendations have been proposed which reflect general recommendations as well as those specific to maintaining the critical care workforce, expanding the critical care workforce, rostering and allocation of the critical care workforce, nurse-specific recommendations for staffing the ICU, education support and training during ICU surge situations, workforce support, models of care, and de-escalation. Conclusion: These recommendations are provided with the intent that they be used to guide interdisciplinary decision-making, and we suggest that careful consideration is given to the local context to determine which recommendations are most appropriate to implement and how they are prioritised. Ongoing evaluation of recommendation implementation and impact will be necessary, particularly in rapidly changing clinical contexts.

Journal Title

Australian Critical Care

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Nursing

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Marshall, AP; Austin, DE; Chamberlain, D; Chapple, L-AS; Cree, M; Fetterplace, K; Foster, M; Freeman–Sanderson, A; Fyfe, R; Grealy, BA; Hodak, A; Holley, A; Kruger, P; Kucharski, G; et al. critical care pandemic staffing framework in Australia, Australian Critical Care, 2020

Collections