Delirium care: Real-world solutions to real-world problems

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Eeles, Eamonn
McCrow, Judy
Teodorczuk, Andrew
Caplan, Gideon A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Objectives

Implementation research into delirium care is lacking. Exploiting known practice barriers to understand what management strategies work best in delirium is a means of prioritising care interventions. A consensus approach to determining priority interventions in delirium was derived and related to reference standards in health-care practice. Methods

A workshop of 20 experts was held at the Australasian Delirium Association conference 2016. Structured small group work, iterative ranking and a 21-member check were undertaken to (i) explore research barriers in delirium care; (ii) explore how barriers related to individual items of multicomponent interventions; and (iii) rank multicomponent interventions in relation to each statement within the newly released Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care delirium standard. Results

Top-ranking interventions included the following: education and training, comprehensive geriatric assessment, family partnerships, individualised care and multidisciplinary engagement. Conclusion

Delirium experts identified a minimum standard of any care intervention for delirium.

Journal Title

Australasian Journal on Ageing

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

36

Issue

4

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Human society

Psychology

Other psychology not elsewhere classified

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections