Risk Managing in the Courts: Seeds of a Divergent Jurisprudence (Working paper)
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
In Australia, risk analysis, risk assessment and risk management are buzz words for decision-makers who must deal with the prospective - but relatively uncertain - impacts of climate change and other environmental risks. But what do these terms mean in practice and how do they play out in the courts? This short paper identifies some divergent approaches to these issues with particular regard to cases involving a risk of flooding.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2017 Griffith University Law School and the Author(s). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.
Item Access Status
Note
No. 17-27
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Law
Risk Assessment
Courts
Flooding
Persistent link to this record
Citation
England, P, Risk Managing in the Courts: Seeds of a Divergent Jurisprudence (Working paper), 2017