Arthropod Sampling In Australian Subtropical Rainforests - How accurate are some of the more common techniques
File version
Author(s)
Kitching, R.
Carruthers, G.
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
As part of long-term research on the canopy of subtropical rain forest in southeast Queens- land, we have compared three common techniques of insect collecting-sweeping, beating and insecticidal spraying. Segments of understory vegetation were sampled using either sweepnets or beating trays in a standard fashion and then, the same sites were misted using pyrethrum. Samples based on sweep netting collected only 10% of the numbers collected by misting, and beating approximately 25%. The proportions of insect orders collected by each method also different significantly, illustrative of the fact that these methods are effective only for certain groups of insects. Misting and beating generated similar proportions of the major taxa whereas sweeping underestimated Collembola and overestimated Diptera. For non-insect arthropods, both beating and sweeping overestimated the proportions of Araneida and substantially underestimated the Amphipoda. The use of sweeping and beating, therefore, provided very substantial underestimates of the fauna.
Journal Title
Selbyana
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
17
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Plant Biology