Mental health: the Achilles heel of evidence-based policy
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Although there is a growing interest in evidence-based medicine in clinical practice, translation of the same principles to health policy is more sporadic. This article examines the gap between reality and aspiration in the area of mental health. It specifically examines two initiatives in the wake of public concern about the link between violence and psychiatric disorder: specialist services for severe or dangerous severe personality disorders, and compulsory community treatment. Neither of these interventions has been shown to be clearly evidence based. In terms of numbers needed to treat, it would take 100 community treatment orders to prevent one readmission and 500 to prevent one arrest. This paper asks for more honesty about how, when, and if we use research evidence.
Journal Title
Clinician in Management
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
13
Issue
1
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Multi-Disciplinary