Co-operative Values, Institutions and Free Riding in Australia: Can it Learn from Canada?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Peetz, D
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2005
Size

124232 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

While there is a strong logic favouring cooperation, it faces a central problem: the 'free rider' or 'cheat'. Collectives find ways of promoting norms of solidarity, and seek regulation to prevent free riding. Around two fifths of Australian employees on collective agreements are free-riding non-members. Evidence suggests the recent growth of free riding does not signify the decline of cooperative values and the ascendancy of individualism. Rather, it reflects institutional changes. The Canadian solution to the cheating problem, the Rand formula, inspired Australian unions to introduce (excessive) 'agency fees' into collective agreements. They were eventually stopped by the state. Alternative models include 'social obligation fees' - provisions for employees covered by the agreement to make a contribution to a voluntary organisation of their choice.

Journal Title

Relations industrielles. Industrial relations

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

60

Issue

4

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2005 Laval University. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Sociology

Human resources and industrial relations

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections