Analysis of Four Historical Ciphers Against Known Plaintext Frequency Statistical Attack

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Wen, Chuah Chai
Samylingam, Vivegan AL
Darmawan, Irfan
Palaniappan, P Siva Shamala
Foozy, Cik Feresa Mohd
Ramli, Sofia Najwa
Alawatugoda, Janaka
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2018
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

The need of keeping information securely began thousands of years. The practice to keep the information securely is by scrambling the message into unreadable form namely ciphertext. This process is called encryption. Decryption is the reverse process of encryption. For the past, historical ciphers are used to perform encryption and decryption process. For example, the common historical ciphers are Hill cipher, Playfair cipher, Random Substitution cipher and Vigenère cipher. This research is carried out to examine and to analyse the security level of these four historical ciphers by using known plaintext frequency statistical attack. The result had shown that Playfair cipher and Hill cipher have better security compare with Vigenère cipher and Random Substitution cipher.

Journal Title

International Journal of Integrated Engineering

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

10

Issue

6

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© Penerbit UTHM. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Cryptography

Civil engineering

Science & Technology

Technology

Engineering, Multidisciplinary

Engineering

Historical Ciphers

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Wen, CC; Samylingam, VAL; Darmawan, I; Palaniappan, PSS; Foozy, CFM; Ramli, SN; Alawatugoda, J, Analysis of Four Historical Ciphers Against Known Plaintext Frequency Statistical Attack, International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 2018, 10 (6), pp. 183-192

Collections