Taxonomy of measurement properties: A response to the commentary by Mokkink et al. (2015)
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
I appreciate the opportunity to respond to the recent letter by Mokkink et al. (2016). Their letter expressed concerns about a measurement taxonomy developed by Polit and Yang (2016), as described by Polit (2015) in an article in this journal.
The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) was an important international effort to clarify concepts relating to measurement (Mokkink et al., 2010). The COSMIN group and its panel of measurement experts are to be applauded for numerous contributions in the field of health measurement, including providing consensus-based definitions of measurement properties, developing checklists for assessing instrument development, and creating the COSMIN measurement taxonomy.
Journal Title
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
53
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Nursing
Nursing not elsewhere classified