Re-analysis of the "engraved" Diprotodon tooth from Spring Creek, Victoria, Australia

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Langley, Michelle C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Despite at least 20,000 years of coexistence – and the ubiquity of bone technology across the Australian continent – direct evidence for the use of megafaunal materials (skin, bone, teeth, etc.) remains as elusive as evidence for these creatures having been hunted. Amongst the slim evidence for human–megafauna interaction currently available, one of the most often cited cases is the “engraved” incisor from the giant wombat-like Diprotodon optatum recovered from Spring Creek located in Eastern Maar country in south-eastern Australia. Despite comments in the literature that the marks observed on this tooth are unlikely to have been made by lithic tools (as originally proposed), this item has never been re-analysed in order to resolve the question: Which actor made these marks? Here, the results of a new analysis of this specimen are presented. Through microscopic examination of each mark alongside zooarchaeological and ecological data, it is demonstrated that the incisions were indeed not made by human hands, but instead by a small (2–5 kg) mammal, most likely a scavenging spotted-tailed quoll (Dasyurus maculatus).

Journal Title

Archaeology in Oceania

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

55

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Linguistics

Archaeology

Science & Technology

Social Sciences

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Anthropology

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Langley, MC, Re-analysis of the "engraved" Diprotodon tooth from Spring Creek, Victoria, Australia, Archaeology in Oceania, 2020, 55 (1), pp. 33-41

Collections