A prospective cohort study comparing neonatal outcomes of waterbirth and land birth in an Australian tertiary maternity unit

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Seed, E
Kearney, L
Weaver, E
Ryan, EG
Nugent, R
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2022
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Background: Maternal preference for warm water immersion (WWI) and waterbirth is increasing, but adoption into obstetric guidelines and clinical practice remains limited. Concerns regarding safety and a paucity of evidence have been cited as reasons for the limited adoption and uptake. Aim: The aim was to investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes after WWI and/or waterbirth compared with land birth. Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in an Australian public maternity hospital between 2019 and 2020. Maternal and neonatal outcomes for 1665 women who had a vaginal birth were studied. Primary outcome was admission to the neonatal unit (NNU). Secondary outcomes included neonatal antibiotic administration, maternal intrapartum fever, epidural use and perineal injury. Multivariate logistical regression analyses compared the outcomes between three groups: waterbirth, WWI only and land birth. Results: NNU admissions for a suspected infectious condition were significantly higher in the land birth group (P = 0.035). After accounting for labour duration, epidural use and previous birth mode, no significant difference was detected between groups in the odds of NNU admission (P = 0.167). No babies were admitted to NNU with water inhalation or drowning. Women birthing on land were more likely to be febrile (2 vs 0%; P = 0.007); obstetric anal sphincter injury and postpartum haemorrhage were similar between groups. Regional analgesia use was significantly lower in the WWI group compared to the land birth group (21.02 vs 38.58%; P = <0.001). There was one cord avulsion in the waterbirth group (0.41%). Conclusion: Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar between groups, with no increased risk evident in the waterbirth and WWI groups.

Journal Title

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2022 The Authors. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered in Griffith Research Online as an advanced online version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Paediatrics

Public health

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Seed, E; Kearney, L; Weaver, E; Ryan, EG; Nugent, R, A prospective cohort study comparing neonatal outcomes of waterbirth and land birth in an Australian tertiary maternity unit, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2022

Collections