Bigger or better: The relative benefits of protected area network expansion and enforcement for the conservation of an exploited species
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Adams, Vanessa M
Possingham, Hugh P
Bode, Michael
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
The global portfolio of protected areas is growing rapidly, despite widely recognized shortfalls in management effectiveness. Pressure to meet area-coverage and management effectiveness objectives makes it essential to determine how limited conservation funds should be allocated between expanding protected area networks and better enforcing existing reserves. We formally explore this question for the particular case of an exploited species in a partially protected system, using a general model linking protection, enforcement and legal/illegal resource extraction. We show that, on average, funds should be disproportionately invested in enforcement rather than expansion. Further, expansion alone, without additional enforcement, can actually reduce conservation outcomes. To help guide future decisions, we calculate the optimal allocation of resources between these two actions given any current level of enforcement and protected area coverage. In most cases, simultaneously investing in expansion and enforcement is the optimal decision. However, in places with low enforcement and high protection, protected area contraction, or strategically concentrating enforcement effort, produces the greatest benefits.
Journal Title
Conservation Letters
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
11
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2017 The Authors. Conservation Letters published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Environmental management
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Biodiversity Conservation
Aichi Target 11
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Kuempel, CD; Adams, VM; Possingham, HP; Bode, M, Bigger or better: The relative benefits of protected area network expansion and enforcement for the conservation of an exploited species, Conservation Letters, 2018, 11 (3), pp.e12433