Origin of Implication: How Do Innocent Individuals Enter the Criminal Justice System?
File version
Author(s)
Senn, Samantha L
Dunn, Katherine
Gould, Jon B
Hail-Jares, Katie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Drawing from the investigative policing literature, we develop a typology for how innocent defendants become suspects in criminal investigations. We use the Preventing Wrongful Convictions Project (PWCP) dataset and multivariate modeling to examine the case and defendant characteristics that predict how an innocent defendant became a suspect. We found that investigators identify suspects in eight primary ways. The most common in the PWCP dataset were victim/eyewitness identification, citizen identification, and intentional misidentification. Defendant’s race, age, criminal history, relationship to the victim, cognitive/mental status, and whether the victim survived were strongly associated with an innocent defendant’s origin of implication. These results illuminate how tunnel vision begins in cases with innocent defendants, and how police practices may prevent innocent individuals from becoming suspects.
Journal Title
Crime & Delinquency
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
65
Issue
14
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Criminology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Lowrey-Kinberg, B; Senn, SL; Dunn, K; Gould, JB; Hail-Jares, K, Origin of Implication: How Do Innocent Individuals Enter the Criminal Justice System?, Crime & Delinquency, 2019, 65 (14), pp. 1949-1975