Development of a paediatric central venous access device database: A retrospective cohort study of practice evolution and risk factors for device failure

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Kleidon, Tricia M
Rickard, Claire M
Schults, Jessica A
Mihala, Gabor
McBride, Craig A
Rudkin, John
Chaseling, Brett
Ullman, Amanda J
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Aim: To describe practice evolution, complications and risk factors for multiple insertion attempts and device failure in paediatric central venous access devices (CVADs).

Methods: A paediatric retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data from CVAD database 2012–2014. Data included were patient (i.e. age, condition), insertion (i.e. indication, device, technique) and removal (complications, dwell). Descriptive statistics and incidence rates were calculated per calendar year and compared. Risk factors for multiple insertion attempts and failure were explored with logistic regression and cox regression, respectively.

Results: A total of 1308 CVADs were observed over 273 467 catheter‐days in 863 patients. Multiple insertion attempts remained static (14%) and significantly associated with non‐haematological oncology (odds ratio 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–4.43), respiratory (3.71; 1.10–12.5), gastroenterology (4.18; 1.66–10.5) and other (difficult intravenous access) (2.74; 1.27–5.92). CVAD failure decreased from 35% (2012) to 25% (2014), incidence rate from 1.50 (95% CI 1.25–1.80) to 1.28 (1.06–1.54) per 1000 catheter‐days. Peripherally inserted CVAD failure was significantly associated with lower body weight (per kilogram decrease, hazard ratio (HR) 1.02; 95% CI 1.00–1.03), cephalic vein (1.62; 1.05–2.62), difficult access (1.92; 1.02–3.73), sub‐optimal tip placement (1.69; 1.06–2.69) and gastroenterology diagnosis (2.27; 1.05–4.90). Centrally placed CVAD failure was significantly associated with younger age (per year, HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00–1.07), tunnelled device (3.38; 2.41–4.73) and gastroenterology diagnosis (1.70; 1.06–2.73).

Conclusions: While advancement in CVAD practices improved overall CVAD insertion and failure outcomes, further improvements and innovation are necessary to ensure improved vessel health and preservation for children requiring CVAD.

Journal Title

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Clinical sciences

Health services and systems

Public health

central venous catheter

clinical registry

paediatrics

peripherally inserted central catheter

quality care

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Kleidon, TM; Rickard, CM; Schults, JA; Mihala, G; McBride, CA; Rudkin, J; Chaseling, B; Ullman, AJ, Development of a paediatric central venous access device database: A retrospective cohort study of practice evolution and risk factors for device failure., Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 2019

Collections