Current controversies and challenges in allergic rhinitis management

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Price, David
Smith, Pete
Hellings, Peter
Papadopoulos, Nikos
Fokkens, Wytske
Muraro, Antonella
Murray, Ruth
Chisholm, Alison
Demoly, Pascal
Scadding, Glenis
Mullol, Joaquim
Lieberman, Phil
Bachert, Claus
Moesges, Ralph
Ryan, Dermot
Bousquet, Jean
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2015
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

There are many obstacles in the path of effective allergy management, in general, and allergic rhinitis (AR) control, in particular. Chief among them are: insufficient symptom relief in some patients provided by some currently considered first-line AR treatments in real life; an over-reliance on randomized controlled trials to direct AR guideline recommendations; the need for a broader interpretation of the AR evidence base (to include randomized controlled trials and real-life studies); poorly designed and interpreted studies; and lack of an AR control concept and common language of control. These controversies are fully reviewed here and challenging solutions have been presented.

Journal Title

Expert Review of Clinical Immunology

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

11

Issue

11

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Immunology

Immunology not elsewhere classified

Allergic rhinitis

Clinical relevance

Randomized controlled trials

Real life

Control

Guidelines

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections