The dangers of mandating policy in the absence of clear evidence: Authors' response
File version
Author(s)
Vos, Theo
Veerman, Lennert
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
The Authors’ reply We note the response from Morton Satin1 to our paper illustrating the potential cost-effectiveness and public health benefits from a reduction in salt in some processed foods.2 Mr Satin represents the view of the Salt Institute. He makes no secret of his affiliation with the salt industry and also reminds us that such affiliations do compromise objective interpretation of the evidence.
Journal Title
Heart
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
97
Issue
4
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
Clinical sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
SALT INTAKE
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Cobiac, LJ; Vos, T; Veerman, L, The dangers of mandating policy in the absence of clear evidence: Authors' response, Heart, 2011, 97 (4), pp. 342-342