Policies That Don't Bind: The Decision in Akmeemana v Murray

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Cameron, Craig
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2010
Size

108633 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

From an employer's perspective, policies are a formal method of conveying to employees, as well as assisting their compliance with, legal obligations in matters including workplace health and safety, grievance handling, sexual harassment, discrimination, trade practices, negligence and contract.1 Policies also serve to clarify the employee's rights and responsibilities and enunciate accepted standards of conduct. As a separate document to each individual employment contract, policies offer consistency in regulating employment issues because they apply to all employees and provide the flexibility of adding to and varying them. Despite this physical separation between policy and contract, policies can bind the employer and employee as part of the employment contract. The Supreme Court of New South Wales in Akmeemana v Murray2 recently considered the circumstances in which policies are incorporated into an employment contract. Akmeemana is one of few cases where the employer, not the employee, wanted a policy to have contractual force.3 In finding that the policies had no contractual force, Davies J in Akmeemana addresses four aspects relevant to the existing jurisprudence concerning policy and contract: incorporation of policy by reference; variation of policy; policy as implied term; and non-policy statements. This article commences with a summary of the Akmeemana decision.I then engage in a brief review of the existing jurisprudence.4 This provides a useful context to the subsequent discussion of the four relevant aspects of the judgment. I conclude with a discussion of how Akmeemana fits within the existing jurisprudence and the lessons, some new and some repeated, it conveys to employers who wish to give contractual force to statements not expressed in the employment contract.

Journal Title

Australian Journal of Labour Law

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

23

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2010 Lexis Nexis. Self-archiving of the author-manuscript version is not yet supported by this publisher. Please refer to the journal link for access to the definitive, published version or contact the author[s] for more information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Labour Law

Business and Management

Policy and Administration

Law

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections