We need to better recognise and value the contribution of nurses to end-of-life care (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Bloomer, Melissa J
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2022
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Dear Editor We read with interest the paper by Benbenishty et al. (2021) in which a comparison is made between select findings from two international surveys focused on end-of-life practices in intensive care, known as ETHICUS-I and ETHICUS-II. I want to start by commending the authors on undertaking this comparative study, which specifically examines the changes in nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making between 1999 and 2000, when ETHICUS-I was conducted and 2015–16 when ETHICUS-II was conducted. Whilst there were some inherent differences in sample size and the number of countries represented between the two surveys, there were also differences in survey respondents with all responses to ETHICUS-I provided by physicians, compared to ETHICUS-II where just over 8% of respondents were nurses.

Journal Title

Intensive and Critical Care Nursing

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered as an advanced online version in Griffith Research Online.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Acute care

Intensive care

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Bloomer, MJ, We need to better recognise and value the contribution of nurses to end-of-life care (Letter), Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2022, pp. 103210

Collections