Promoting pre-recorded complainant evidence in rape trials: Psychological and practice perspectives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Kebbell, Mark
Westera, Nina
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2011
Size

85657 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

In this article, the authors, a forensic psychologist and police officer, explore how pre-recorded police interviews with complainants may be presented as evidence-in-chief and used to support the prosecution case for alleged rape offences. They discuss the advantages and disadvantages of pre-recording, and how its introduction will necessitate a profound shift in police culture and the conventional "case construction" model used by police. The article concludes by identifying the range of reforms to current police practice required to address some of problems associated with using pre-recorded evidence in rape trials.

Journal Title

Criminal Law Journal

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

35

Issue

6

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2011 Thomson Reuters. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Forensic psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections