Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste (Letter)

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Withers, C
Noble, C
Brandenburg, C
Glasziou, PP
Stehlik, P
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2021
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

To the Editor: A significant driver of research waste is the incentive to do research for career progression, rather than for its relevance and patient impact, especially when volume is rewarded over quality.1 We previously found that most specialty training colleges mandate that trainees conduct research, often without requiring research training and appropriate supervision. The focus tends to be on completing projects and leading research, rather than on learning fundamental research principles.2

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

215

Issue

7

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Specialist studies in education

Research design

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Withers, C; Noble, C; Brandenburg, C; Glasziou, PP; Stehlik, P, Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste (Letter), Medical Journal of Australia, 2021, 215 (7), pp. 336-336.e1

Collections