Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Noble, C
Brandenburg, C
Glasziou, PP
Stehlik, P
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
To the Editor: A significant driver of research waste is the incentive to do research for career progression, rather than for its relevance and patient impact, especially when volume is rewarded over quality.1 We previously found that most specialty training colleges mandate that trainees conduct research, often without requiring research training and appropriate supervision. The focus tends to be on completing projects and leading research, rather than on learning fundamental research principles.2
Journal Title
Medical Journal of Australia
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
215
Issue
7
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Specialist studies in education
Research design
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Withers, C; Noble, C; Brandenburg, C; Glasziou, PP; Stehlik, P, Selection criteria for Australian and New Zealand medical specialist training programs: another under-recognised driver of research waste (Letter), Medical Journal of Australia, 2021, 215 (7), pp. 336-336.e1