Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: A study protocol

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Watts, Stacey
Apte, Yogesh
Holland, Thomas
Hatt, April
Craswell, Alison
Lin, Frances
Tabah, Alexis
Ware, Robert
Byrnes, Joshua
Anstey, Christopher
Keijzers, Gerben
Ramanan, Mahesh
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Lascarrou, Jean Baptiste

Date
2024
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract

Background When clinicians need to administer a vasopressor infusion, they are faced with the choice of administration via either peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) or central venous catheter (CVC). Vasopressor infusions have traditionally been administered via central venous catheters (CVC) rather than Peripheral Intra Venous Catheters (PIVC), primarily due to concerns of extravasation and resultant tissue injury. This practice is not guided by contemporary randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence. Observational data suggests safety of vasopressor infusion via PIVC. To address this evidence gap, we have designed the “Vasopressors Infused via Peripheral or Central Access” (VIPCA) RCT.

Methods The VIPCA trial is a single-centre, feasibility, parallel-group RCT. Eligible critically ill patients requiring a vasopressor infusion will be identified by emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) staff and randomised to receive vasopressor infusion via either PIVC or CVC. Primary outcome is feasibility, a composite of recruitment rate, proportion of eligible patients randomised, protocol fidelity, retention and missing data. Primary clinical outcome is days alive and out of hospital up to day-30. Secondary outcomes will include safety and other clinical outcomes, and process and cost measures. Specific aspects of safety related to vasopressor infusions such as extravasation, leakage, device failure, tissue injury and infection will be assessed.

Discussion VIPCA is a feasibility RCT whose outcomes will inform the feasibility and design of a multicentre Phase-3 trial comparing routes of vasopressor delivery. The exploratory economic analysis will provide input data for the full health economic analysis which will accompany any future Phase-3 RCT.

Journal Title

PLOS ONE

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

19

Issue

5

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2024 Watts et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Nursing

Intensive care

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Watts, S; Apte, Y; Holland, T; Hatt, A; Craswell, A; Lin, F; Tabah, A; Ware, R; Byrnes, J; Anstey, C; Keijzers, G; Ramanan, M, Randomised, controlled, feasibility trial comparing vasopressor infusion administered via peripheral cannula versus central venous catheter for critically ill adults: A study protocol, PLOS ONE, 2024, 19(5), e0295347

Collections