Quality management systems in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: a review of the literature
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Franklin, Richard C
McBain-Rigg, Kristin Emma
Larkins, Sarah
Roe, Yvette
Panaretto, Kathryn
Saunders, Vicki
Crowe, Melissa
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A national accreditation policy for the Australian primary healthcare (PHC) system was initiated in 2008. While certification standards are mandatory, little is known about their effects on the efficiency and sustainability of organisations, particularly in the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service (ACCHS) sector. AIM: The literature review aims to answer the following: to what extent does the implementation of the International Organisation for Standardization 9001:2008 quality management system (QMS) facilitate efficiency and sustainability in the ACCHS sector? METHODS: Thematic analysis of peer-reviewed and grey literature was undertaken from Australia and New Zealand PHC sector with a focus on First Nations people. The databases searched included Medline, Scopus and three Informit sites (AHB-ATSIS, AEI-ATSIS and AGIS-ATSIS). The initial search strategy included quality improvement, continuous quality improvement, efficiency and sustainability. RESULTS: Sixteen included studies were assessed for quality using the McMaster criteria. The studies were ranked against the criteria of credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability. Three central themes emerged: accreditation (n=4), quality improvement (n=9) and systems strengthening (n=3). The accreditation theme included effects on health service expenditure and clinical outcomes, consistency and validity of accreditation standards and linkages to clinical governance frameworks. The quality improvement theme included audit effectiveness and value for specific population health. The theme of systems strengthening included prerequisite systems and embedded clinical governance measures for innovative models of care. CONCLUSION: The ACCHS sector warrants reliable evidence to understand the value of QMSs and enhancement tools, particularly given ACCHS (client-centric) services and their specialist status. Limited evidence exists for the value of standards on health system sustainability and efficiency in Australia. Despite a mandatory second certification standard, no studies reported on sustainability and efficiency of a QMS in PHC.
Journal Title
BMJ Open Quality
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
10
Issue
3
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Clinical sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Health Care Sciences & Services
Medicine, General & Internal
General & Internal Medicine
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Darr, JO; Franklin, RC; McBain-Rigg, KE; Larkins, S; Roe, Y; Panaretto, K; Saunders, V; Crowe, M, Quality management systems in Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services: a review of the literature, BMJ Open Quality, 2021, 10 (3)