Measuring editorial skill and error
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Academics produce and consume information. Refereed journal articles categorize information by topic, screen it for reliability, and sort it into a reputational hierarchy, which aims to differentiate information of greater or lesser value. Journal rankings are set mainly by citations, measured as impact factors (IF) or H indices (Callaway, 2016). Many academic reviews include only high-ranked journals. Rankings have powerful effects on university funding and individual careers (Buckley, 2019). Academics submit articles preferentially to higher-ranked journals, despite extra effort in reformats, revisions, resubmissions and rejections, because higher-ranked publications yield higher rewards. Higher-ranked journals can charge higher subscriptions and publication fees. Journal editors preferentially accept articles that they assess as more original (Sanchez, Makkonen, & Williams, 2019), but they cannot describe this judgement objectively (Sanchez et al., 2019).
Journal Title
Annals of Tourism Research
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
81
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2020 Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Licence, which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, providing that the work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Commercial services
Marketing
Tourism
Social Sciences
Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism
Sociology
Social Sciences - Other Topics
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Buckley, R, Measuring editorial skill and error, Annals of Tourism Research, 2020, 81