Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Tam, Michael
McGeechan, Kevin
Price, Karen
McLean, Katrina
Tracy, Marguerite
Hall, John
Knight, Andrew
Vuong, Kylie
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Abstract
Background Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection and management of high-risk individuals. Melanoma risk-prediction models are available to assist in the identification of high-risk patients but are not routinely used clinically.
Aim To examine how GPs assessed and managed melanoma risk, and the opportunities for using melanoma risk-prediction models in primary care.
Design and setting Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 Australian GPs.
Method GPs who had completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire study on melanoma risk were purposively sampled and recruited. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with Australian GPs between 9 July and 10 September 2019. Interviews were audiorecorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using grounded theory.
Results Melanoma risk assessment and its management can be understood as a linear workflow consisting of five clinical process domains with patient selection as the entry point. There was variation between GPs on the identification of melanoma risk factors, melanoma risk estimation, management, and patient education because of intuitive and analytical processes guiding risk assessment, and the influence of patient factors. GPs were largely receptive towards melanoma risk-prediction models, sharing facilitators for and barriers to their potential implementation.
Conclusion Further primary care interventions sensitive to existing workflow arrangements may be required to standardise melanoma risk-assessment and management processes.
Journal Title
British Journal of General Practice
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
72
Issue
723
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© The Author(s) 2022. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
General practice
Oncology and carcinogenesis
Health services and systems
Melanoma
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Primary Health Care
Medicine, General & Internal
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Anandasivam, B; Tam, M; McGeechan, K; Price, K; McLean, K; Tracy, M; Hall, J; Knight, A; Vuong, K, Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs, British Journal of General Practice, 2022, 72 (723), pp. e737-e746