Individual and group religious freedom in the european court of human rights: Cracks in the intellectual architecture

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Evans, C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2010
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects religious freedom, looked for many decades as though it was going to be effectively a dead letter. The European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) did not find a violation of Article 9 until the case of Kokkinakis v. Greece which was decided only seventeen years ago, in 1993. Even after that seminal decision, religious freedom cases were still relatively rare for several years; in 2001, there had been fewer than thirty Court cases on Article 9. However, in the last decade the case law has expanded significantly; and from 2001 to 2010 there have been more than sixty additional cases. Thus, in a relatively short period, the Court has been pushed to develop a jurisprudence of religious freedom to deal with increasingly complex and controversial cases. As the case law has multiplied and the issues have diversified, however, it has become clear that the Court has not yet developed a sufficiently coherent and principled approach to this area. So far, its approach has proved of very limited utility to individuals making claims of religious freedom.

Journal Title

Journal of Law and Religion

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

26

Issue

1

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Religious studies

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Evans, C, Individual and group religious freedom in the european court of human rights: Cracks in the intellectual architecture, Journal of Law and Religion, 2010, 26 (1), pp. 321-343

Collections