Separation of Powers in Australia

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Patapan, H
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
1999
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This article argues that the nature and character of separation of powers in Australia has been fundamentally shaped and defined by the High Court, which chose a Blackstonian, common law conception of separation of judicial powers in preference to the principles elaborated in The Federalist and articulated in the American Constitution. But the Court's recent jurisprudence, including its admission that it makes the law, has presented unprecedented theoretical and political challenges to the concept of separation of judicial power in Australia, including a transformation in the role of the attorneygeneral, the creation of new institutions and a move towards an American conception of checks and balances. Thus this article suggests that the Court continues to exercise a profound influence on the formulation of separation of powers in Australia.

Journal Title

Australian Journal of Political Science

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

34

Issue

3

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Policy and administration

Political science

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections