Foreign Policy

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Trood, Russell
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2013
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

But for the attention certain to be given to the issue of asylum seekers, it is unlikely that foreign policy will play much of a role in the forthcoming election campaign. That’s regrettable, as there are several international issues and relationships that could well be handled differently depending on who wins the approaching poll. The full extent of the differences is difficult to articulate as neither Labor nor the Coalition has yet released its policy platform, but already there’s been enough in various statements by the leaders, ministers and shadow ministers to indicate that there’s certain to be a measure of product differentiation. While policy change is likely, there’s often strong continuity in the conduct of Australian foreign policy. Incoming governments inherit a policy legacy and are also successors to an Australian foreign policy tradition—a national style of acting in international relations. The legacy and the style can change over time, but initially they can act as constraints on policy innovation and reform. The style is by definition more enduring, so we can expect the incoming government to act in some wholly familiar ways. For example, it will remain committed to Australia’s strong tradition of alignment in international affairs; sustain a wide network of relationships across the globe and in multilateral organisations; emphasise the importance of engagement with the countries of the Asia–Pacific; and seek to address global and regional problems practically as a contribution to problem solving. It will also demonstrate, in JDB Miller’s rich morsel of a phrase, a certain ‘dogged low‑gear idealism’—in more recent parlance, good international citizenship in the conduct of our foreign relations. This paper, however, is less about trying to predict the things an incoming government might do than seeks to explore the issues that arguably should receive priority on the foreign policy agenda. Central among them are: > restoring the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) to organisational and budgetary health > consolidating key relationships in Asia > responding to change in the Pacific > advancing the stalled trade agenda > reconsidering priorities in AusAID.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

Agenda for Change: Strategic Choices for the Next Government

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2013 Australian Strategic Policy Institute. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

International Relations

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections