Concepts and Models of Safety, Resilience, and Reliability

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Gao, J
Dekker, S
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)

Juan A. Sanchez; Paul Barach; Julie K. Johnson; Jeffrey P. Jacobs

Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Approaches to safety have often considered the “human” factor in an organisation or operation as a major contributor to unwanted outcomes. The view of “human” as a problem leads to responses that involve trying to exert more control over people. While these may make intuitive sense for some, research suggests that such a view may not be valid as there are an enormous number of other factors (many of which are beyond control of the human at the sharp end) that are behind the creation of success and the occasional failures. This chapter begins with a review of normal accident theory, before using complexity science to fill out the problematic nature of the notion of “human error”. It then discusses one of the prominent problems associated with complexity, safety drift. Lastly, this chapter looks at various proposed solutions (e.g. resilience engineering) by which a healthcare system can manage complexity and perhaps reduce the potential harm to patients.

Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title

Surgical Patient Care: Improving Safety, Quality and Value

Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2017 Springer. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the publisher’s website for further information.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections