Comparisons on the differences in numerical modelling methods between pre-bored pressuremeter and self-bored pressuremeter
File version
Version of Record (VoR)
Author(s)
Ong, Dominic Ek Leong
Choo, Chung Siung
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Dominic Ek Leong Ong, Chung Siung Choo
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
License
Abstract
Numerical modelling has proved its versatility in assisting to solve many engineering problems. It has also opened many opportunities for interpretations of material testing which cannot be obtained by the means of analytical approaches alone. Numerical approach is one of the favourable alternatives in interpreting effective strength parameters of highly fractured and weathered rocks from pressuremeter tests. While there are many different types of pressuremeters nowadays, with different designs and tests procedures, the numerical modelling process might not be the same for every instrument. This paper serves to review the difference between two of the most common types of pressuremeters, namely pre-bored pressuremeters (PBPM) and self-boring pressuremeters (SBPM). The two instruments were compared in terms of their physical designs, working mechanisms, test procedure and most subsequently, the impact of their testing characteristics on the numerical modelling process.
Journal Title
Conference Title
Proceedings of the Young Geotechnical Engineers Conference 2016: Contributions of Young Geotechnical Engineers to Nation Building
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2016 Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society. The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the conference's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Construction Engineering
Structural Geology
Environmental Monitoring