Publish and still perish? (Letter)
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
I would like to draw your readers' attention to an issue that has arisen regarding the rules on ‘prior publication’ and how these are implemented. Academic journals are generally loath to re-publish material that has already been published, although this is sometimes acceptable as long as there is appropriate attribution. Some journals extend this ban to media coverage ahead of publication (the Ingelfinger Rule). This has the merit of discouraging authors from seeking media coverage for findings before these have been subject to full peer review. However, the pre-publication and media release rules can work against transparent and effective science communication, as I think happened in the following case.
Journal Title
Addiction
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
113
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Substance Abuse
Psychiatry
Alcohol legislation
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Devilly, GJ, Publish and still perish? (Letter), Addiction, 2018, 113 (2), pp. 374