Project alliancing vs project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum Project

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Walker, DHT
Hampson, K
Peters, R
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2002
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Significant differences between project partnering and project alliancing occur in the selection process, management structure of the organisations undertaking the project and nature of risk and reward incentives. This paper helps clarify the nature of project alliancing and how alliance member organisations were selected for this case study. A core issue that differentiates between the two approaches is that in partnering, partners may reap rewards at the expense of other partners. In alliancing each alliance member places their profit margin and reward structure "at risk". Thus in alliancing, the entire alliance entity either benefits together or not all. This fundamentally changes the motivation and dynamics of the relationship between alliance members.

Journal Title

Supply Chain Management

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

7

Issue

2

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Marketing

Other commerce, management, tourism and services

Strategy, management and organisational behaviour

Transportation, logistics and supply chains

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Walker, DHT; Hampson, K; Peters, R, Project alliancing vs project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum Project, Supply Chain Management, 2002, 7 (2), pp. 83-91

Collections