Project alliancing vs project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum Project
File version
Author(s)
Hampson, K
Peters, R
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
Significant differences between project partnering and project alliancing occur in the selection process, management structure of the organisations undertaking the project and nature of risk and reward incentives. This paper helps clarify the nature of project alliancing and how alliance member organisations were selected for this case study. A core issue that differentiates between the two approaches is that in partnering, partners may reap rewards at the expense of other partners. In alliancing each alliance member places their profit margin and reward structure "at risk". Thus in alliancing, the entire alliance entity either benefits together or not all. This fundamentally changes the motivation and dynamics of the relationship between alliance members.
Journal Title
Supply Chain Management
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
7
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Marketing
Other commerce, management, tourism and services
Strategy, management and organisational behaviour
Transportation, logistics and supply chains
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Walker, DHT; Hampson, K; Peters, R, Project alliancing vs project partnering: A case study of the Australian National Museum Project, Supply Chain Management, 2002, 7 (2), pp. 83-91