Mentorship malpractice

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version

Version of Record (VoR)

Author(s)
Chopra, V
Edelson, DP
Saint, S
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2016
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

The word mentorship evokes strong emotional and intellectual chords. In formal parlance, mentorship has been defined as “a dynamic, reciprocal relationship in a work environment between an advanced-career incumbent (mentor) and a beginner (mentee) aimed at promoting the career development of both.”1 In our careers in academic medicine, we have seen mentees benefit from mentors through development of critical thinking skills and advice on research ideas, scholarship, and networking opportunities. Similarly, now as mentors we have also benefitted by gaining an ally to support our work, developing larger circles of influence, and establishing legacies as academic leaders. It is thus not surprising that mutually beneficial mentor-mentee relationships are a key predictor of academic success.

Journal Title

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

315

Issue

14

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2016 American Medical Association (AMA). The attached file is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Specialist studies in education

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Chopra, V; Edelson, DP; Saint, S, Mentorship malpractice, JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 2016, 315 (14), pp. 1453-1454

Collections