‘‘They’re lunatics on the road’’: Exploring the normative influences of parents, friends, and police on young novices’ risky driving decisions
File version
Author(s)
Watson, Barry
King, Mark J
Hyde, Melissa K
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
115580 bytes
File type(s)
application/pdf
Location
License
Abstract
Purpose Young novice drivers experience significantly greater risk of being injured or killed in car crashes than older more experienced drivers. This research utilised a qualitative approach guided by the framework of Akers' social learning theory. It explored young novice drivers' perspectives on risky driving including rewards and punishments expected from and administered by parents, friends, and police, imitation of parents' and friends' driving, and advantages and disadvantages of risky driving. Methods Twenty-one young drivers (12 females, 9 males) aged 16-25 years (M = 17.71 years, SD = 2.15) with a Learner (n = 11) or Provisional (n = 10) driver licence participated in individual or small group interviews. Findings and conclusions Content analysis supported four themes: (1) rewards and (2) punishments for risky driving, and the influence of (3) parents and (4) friends. The young novice drivers differed in their vulnerability to the negative influences of friends and parents, with some novices advising they were able to resist risky normative influences whilst others felt they could not. The authority of the police as enforcers of road rules was either accepted and respected or seen as being used to persecute young novices. These findings suggest that road safety interventions should consider the normative influence of parents and friends on the risky and safe behaviour of young novices. Police were also seen as influential upon behaviour. Future research should explore the complicated relationship between parents, friends, the police, young novices, and their risky driving behaviour.
Journal Title
Safety Science
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
50
Issue
9
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2012 Elsevier. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Engineering
Biomedical and clinical sciences
Psychology