15 priorities for wind-waves research: An Australian perspective

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Greenslade, Diana
Hemer, Mark
Babanin, Alex
Lowe, Ryan
Turner, Ian
Power, Hannah
Young, Ian
Ierodiaconou, Daniel
Hibbert, Greg
Williams, Greg
Aijaz, Saima
Albuquerque, Joao
Allen, Stewart
Banner, Michael
Branson, Paul
Buchan, Steve
Burton, Andrew
Bye, John
Cartwright, Nick
Chabchoub, Amin
Colberg, Frank
Contardo, Stephanie
Dufois, Francois
Earl-Spurr, Craig
Farr, David
Goodwin, Ian
Gunson, Jim
Hansen, Jeff
Hanslow, David
Harley, Mitchell
Hetzel, Yasha
Hoeke, Ron
Jones, Nicole
Kinsela, Michael
Liu, Qingxiang
Makarynskyy, Oleg
Marcollo, Hayden
Mazaheri, Said
McConochie, Jason
Millar, Grant
Moltmann, Tim
Moodie, Neal
Morim, Joao
Morison, Russel
Orszaghova, Jana
Pattiaratchi, Charitha
Pomeroy, Andrew
Proctor, Roger
Provis, David
Reef, Ruth
Rijnsdorp, Dirk
Rutherford, Martin
Schulz, Eric
Shayer, Jake
Splinter, Kristen
Steinberg, Craig
Strauss, Darrell
Stuart, Greg
Symonds, Graham
Tarbath, Karina
Taylor, Daniel
Taylor, James
Thotagamuwage, Darshani
Toffoli, Alessandro
Valizadeh, Alireza
van Hazel, Jonathan
da Silva, Guilherme Vieira
Wandres, Moritz
Whittaker, Colin
Williams, David
Winter, Gundula
Xu, Jiangtao
Zhong, Aihong
Zieger, Stefan
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2020
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

This paper describes the process and outcomes of a collaborative process across different Australian stakeholder groups to identify the highest priorities in wind-wave research.

The Australian marine research, industry and stakeholder community has recently undertaken an extensive collaborative process to identify the highest national priorities for wind-waves research. This was undertaken under the auspices of the Forum for Operational Oceanography Surface Wave’s Working Group. The main steps in the process were firstly, soliciting possible research questions from the community via an online survey; secondly, reviewing the questions at a face-to-face workshop; and thirdly, online ranking of the research questions by individuals. This process resulted in 15 identified priorities, covering research activities and the development of infrastructure. The top 5 priorities are 1) Enhanced and updated nearshore and coastal bathymetry; 2) Improved understanding of extreme sea-states; 3) Maintain and enhance in situ buoy network; 4) Improved data access and sharing; and 5) Ensemble and probabilistic wave modelling and forecasting. In this paper, each of the 15 priorities is discussed in detail, providing insight into why each priority is important, and the current state-of-the-art, both nationally and internationally, where relevant. While this process has been driven by Australian needs, it is likely that the results will be relevant to other marine-focussed nations.

Journal Title

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Atmospheric sciences

Physical geography and environmental geoscience

Climate change science

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Greenslade, et al., 15 priorities for wind-waves research: An Australian perspective, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Collections