Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership Mediate the Effects of Empowering Leadership on Both Good and Bad Employee Behaviors
File version
Author(s)
Beehr, Terry A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
This study examined the potential effects of empowering leadership on followers’ in-role performance and deviant behaviors via self-efficacy and psychological ownership over a 3-week period in a sample of 299 full-time employees working in the United States. Results from structural equation modeling demonstrated that empowering leadership was positively related to both self-efficacy and psychological ownership, which in turn were both negatively related to deviant behaviors. Alternative model comparisons and bootstrapping both confirmed the mediation effects of self-efficacy and psychological ownership. However, only one of the two mediators, self-efficacy, was positively related to followers’ in-role performance. Together, these findings highlighted the important roles of self-efficacy and psychological ownership explaining why empowering leadership may result in followers’ behaviors.
Journal Title
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
24
Issue
4
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Kim, M. &Beehr, T. A., Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership Mediate the Effects of Empowering Leadership on Both Good and Bad Employee Behaviors, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2017, 24 (4), pp. 466-478. Copyright 2017 The Authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Strategy, management and organisational behaviour
Other economics
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Kim, M; Beehr, TA, Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership Mediate the Effects of Empowering Leadership on Both Good and Bad Employee Behaviors, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2017, 24 (4), pp. 466-478