Cultural validation of the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders in Indigenous Australians

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Toombs, Maree
Nasir, Bushra
Kisely, Steve
Ranmuthugala, Geetha
Gill, Neeraj S
Beccaria, Gavin
Hayman, Noel
Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Srinivas N
Nicholson, Geoffrey C
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2019
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the cultural appropriateness of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) as an acceptable tool for diagnosing mental illness among Indigenous people. METHODS: De-identified qualitative feedback from participants and psychologists regarding the cultural appropriateness of the SCID-I for Indigenous people using open-ended anonymous questionnaires was gathered. Aboriginal Medial Service staff and Indigenous Support Workers participated in a focus group. RESULTS: A total of 95.6% of participants felt comfortable during the 498 questionnaires completed. Psychologists also provided qualitative feedback for 502 (92.3%) interviews, of whom 40.4% established a good rapport with participants. Of the participants, 77.7% understood the SCID-I questions well, while 72.5% did not require any cultural allowances to reach a clinical diagnosis. CONCLUSION: When administered by a culturally safe trained psychologist, SCID-I is well tolerated in this group.

Journal Title

Australasian Psychiatry

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note

This publication has been entered into Griffith Research Online as an Advanced Online Version.

Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections