Wrong premise, right direction, but let's go further
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
‘Realist’ interpretations of personality factors require scales with factorial coherence and independent psychobiological confirmation. Like most (if not all) personality models, the Five-Factor Model traits fail these tests, making them poor candidates for analysing causal relations between personality and either behaviour or life outcomes. More finely-focused scales, such as the facet scales advocated by Mõttus, show more promise for causal analyses, provided they can be shown to be unifactorial, clearly verifiable with psychobiological evidence, and aligned with fundamental psychological theories. Variance decomposition will assist causal analyses using such scales.
Journal Title
European Journal of Personality
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
30
Issue
4
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Psychology
Persistent link to this record
Citation
Poropat, A, Wrong premise, right direction, but let's go further, European Journal of Personality, 2016, 30 (4), pp. 322-323