Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement executive summary: coronary artery calcium scoring

No Thumbnail Available
File version
Author(s)
Hamilton-Craig, Christian R
Chow, Clara K
Younger, John F
Jelinek, VM
Chan, Jonathan
Liew, Gary YH
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2017
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract

Introduction: This article summarises the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring. CAC scoring is a non-invasive method for quantifying coronary artery calcification using computed tomography. It is a marker of atherosclerotic plaque burden and the strongest independent predictor of future myocardial infarction and mortality. CAC scoring provides incremental risk information beyond traditional risk calculators such as the Framingham Risk Score. Its use for risk stratification is confined to primary prevention of cardiovascular events, and can be considered as individualised coronary risk scoring for intermediate risk patients, allowing reclassification to low or high risk based on the score. Medical practitioners should carefully counsel patients before CAC testing, which should only be undertaken if an alteration in therapy, including embarking on pharmacotherapy, is being considered based on the test result. Main recommendations: • CAC scoring should primarily be performed on individuals without coronary disease aged 45e75 years (absolute 5-year cardiovascular risk of 10e15%) who are asymptomatic. • CAC scoring is also reasonable in lower risk groups (absolute 5-year cardiovascular risk, < 10%) where risk scores traditionally underestimate risk (eg, family history of premature CVD) and in patients with diabetes aged 40e60 years. • We recommend aspirin and a high efficacy statin in high risk patients, defined as those with a CAC score > 400, or a CAC score of 100e399 and above the 75th percentile for age and sex. • It is reasonable to treat patients with CAC scores > 100 with aspirin and a statin. • It is reasonable not to treat asymptomatic patients with a CAC score of zero. Changes in management as result of this statement: • Cardiovascular risk is reclassified according to CAC score. • High risk patients are treated with a high efficacy statin and aspirin. • Very low risk patients (ie, CAC score of zero) do not benefit from treatment.

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

207

Issue

8

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Science & Technology

Life Sciences & Biomedicine

Medicine, General & Internal

General & Internal Medicine

Randomized-Controlled-Trials

Persistent link to this record
Citation

Hamilton-Craig, CR; Chow, CK; Younger, JF; Jelinek, VM; Chan, J; Liew, GYH, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand position statement executive summary: coronary artery calcium scoring, Medical Journal of Australia, 2017, 207 (8), pp. 357-361

Collections