Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations
File version
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Chris Miller and Lionel Orchard
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
The Australian federal system is often seen as a barrier to both the achievement of coherent and cohesive public policy, and the larger social democratic project. The formal limits on sovereignty set out in the constitution; the gross unevenness of financial autonomy (the vertical fiscal imbalance); the inequity in the distribution of policy capacity; and the continuous need to negotiate and renegotiate with unwilling partners all serve to frustrate politicians and public servants alike, and act as a brake on clear policy direction and effective delivery. The situation is exacerbated by weaknesses at local and regional level and the traditional local government emphasis on ‘services to property’, commonly characterised as ‘roads rates and rubbish’ (Dollery et al, 2006, 556). While this much is universally acknowledged, the opportunities provided by a federal system to moderate the excesses of neoliberalism and social conservatism at either state or federal level are less commonly recognised. At its best, our system of multilevel governance has the capacity to provide spaces for community engagement, a chance to escape a ‘one size fits all’ policy straightjacket and facilitate the pursuit of a more progressive policy agenda
Journal Title
Conference Title
Book Title
Australian Public Policy: Progressive Ideas in the Neoliberal Ascendency
Edition
Volume
Issue
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Australian Government and Politics
Public Policy