Authors' Response to Comment on "Guidelines for Use of the Approximate Beta-Poisson Dose-Response Model": Previously Published Guidelines Continue to Be Ignored
File version
Accepted Manuscript (AM)
Author(s)
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
Size
File type(s)
Location
License
Abstract
We thank Dr. Philip J. Schmidt for his comment on our recently published article “Guidelines for Use of the Approximate Beta-Poisson Dose-Response Model” (Xie et al. 2016 (1)). This gives us an opportunity to have a deeper understanding of their work (Schmidt et al. 2013 (2)) and a critical review of our work (Xie et al. 2016 (1)). Through this response and the discussions, we hope the issues around the valid use and the approximation performance assessment of the approximate beta-Poisson dose-response model can be further clarified to ensure the future applications of the beta-Poisson models to be more appropriate and efficient.
Journal Title
Risk Analysis
Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume
37
Issue
2
Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
Publisher link
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement
© 2017 Society for Risk Analysis. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Authors' Response to Comment on "Guidelines for Use of the Approximate Beta-Poisson Dose-Response Model": Previously Published Guidelines Continue to Be Ignored, Risk Analysis, Vol 37(2) pp. 201-203, 2017, which has been published in final form at DOI. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving (http://olabout.wiley.com/WileyCDA/Section/id-828039.html)
Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject
Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified