Usefulness of Austroads' fitness-to-drive guidelines: lessons from the Gillett case

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
File version
Author(s)
Beran, Roy G
Gerber, Paul
Devereux, John A
Griffith University Author(s)
Primary Supervisor
Other Supervisors
Editor(s)
Date
2009
Size

39951 bytes

File type(s)

application/pdf

Location
License
Abstract

Regina v Gillett deals with a man who did not disclose his epilepsy when seeking a drivers licence. Subsequently, he had a seizure while driving, causing an accident in which three people died. He was found guilty but appealed. During the trial to decide whether Gillett was guilty of dangerous driving occasioning death, the judge decided that the Austroads fitness-to-drive guidelines were extraneous to legal consideration of the acceptable risk to be attached to chronic medical conditions. Although the appeal was unsuccessful with respect to guilt and sentencing, it did reinstate the relevance of the Austroads guidelines when evaluating suitable risk with respect to potentially dangerous drivers. We suggest that even greater protection can be afforded to the community if a clearly enunciated warning, outlining a driver's responsibilities, were to appear on each drivers license.

Journal Title

Medical Journal of Australia

Conference Title
Book Title
Edition
Volume

190

Issue

9

Thesis Type
Degree Program
School
DOI
Patent number
Funder(s)
Grant identifier(s)
Rights Statement
Rights Statement

© 2009 Australasian Medical Publishing Company. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version.

Item Access Status
Note
Access the data
Related item(s)
Subject

Biomedical and clinical sciences

Psychology

Persistent link to this record
Citation
Collections